Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:
Verification:
What is the name of this Forum?:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: Becky
« on: March 11, 2015, 08:17:26 pm »

Quote from: Steve on September 05, 2014, 08:55:58 pm
sweet bruh
What if it's not a hacker and it's Becky really bored...
Random thought.

Lmao nice though. But I'm the sort of person who would like to preserve what I have and what I've achieved x'D
Posted by: Steve
« on: September 05, 2014, 08:55:58 pm »

Quote from: wsshadowspeak on September 03, 2014, 02:10:20 pm
Banned for excessive, pervasive trolling. Claiming that the maker of Sploder was bin Laden. In fact, I trolled the entire 'General' section's first page. All like 30 threads. I apologize, but I am flippant and will troll random places when I'm in need of sadist humor or angry. I won't troll 'dis forum though.
sweet bruh
What if it's not a hacker and it's Becky really bored...
Random thought.
Posted by: wsshadowspeak
« on: September 03, 2014, 02:10:20 pm »

Banned for excessive, pervasive trolling. Claiming that the maker of Sploder was bin Laden. In fact, I trolled the entire 'General' section's first page. All like 30 threads. I apologize, but I am flippant and will troll random places when I'm in need of sadist humor or angry. I won't troll 'dis forum though.
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: June 24, 2014, 09:35:42 am »

Wait it was a three way tie...

so
Posted by: Hammer Bro
« on: June 24, 2014, 04:47:39 am »

Sorry for bumping an old thread...

but maybe the hacker stopped because Eimonn was suspended to frame him? IDK.
Posted by: YoloSwagMaster69
« on: February 26, 2014, 12:49:26 am »

Okay.
Posted by: Becky
« on: February 25, 2014, 07:04:17 pm »

Yes, Eimonn has been un-banned.
Posted by: YoloSwagMaster69
« on: February 25, 2014, 01:16:25 am »

Is he unbanned yet?
Posted by: YoloSwagMaster69
« on: February 17, 2014, 02:22:52 am »

Quote from: Becky on February 13, 2014, 10:46:39 pm
Well, since the hacking has stopped the most likely outcome is that Eimonn is the hacker, but I will take off the ban in a few days to make sure.
Okay.
Posted by: Becky
« on: February 13, 2014, 10:46:39 pm »

Well, since the hacking has stopped the most likely outcome is that Eimonn is the hacker, but I will take off the ban in a few days to make sure.
Posted by: YoloSwagMaster69
« on: February 13, 2014, 12:57:50 am »

Quote from: #SWOLO on January 10, 2014, 07:37:39 am
Eimonn really wouldn't care either way.
What does this mean?
Posted by: YoloSwagMaster69
« on: February 11, 2014, 02:28:42 am »

So what are you going to do about Eimonn?
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: February 09, 2014, 11:47:33 am »

Quote from: #SWOLO on January 01, 2014, 09:24:03 am
Let's not forget buddycocoloco or possibly TuckingFypo here. Buddy is a dangerous person, and TuckingFypo might be a dark horse here.
I posted this a while back. It might be buddy.
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: February 09, 2014, 11:39:34 am »

Well, let's just say that before TBF I've hacked into stuff before...

But seriously, this website is one of my favorite websites in the whole wide world. I would never do anything to intentionally harm it.
Posted by: YoloSwagMaster69
« on: February 07, 2014, 01:24:20 am »

Quote from: #SWOLO on January 02, 2014, 12:29:20 pm
Doesn't have the rank? You don't need ranks, all you need is a really good keylogger and bingo. Hacked.
So how do we know if it's not you if you know so much?

And, also, can somebody tell me what happened? From what I've seen you don't have any evidence against him so I chose the PoW for extended time thing. I'd say 5 days- 1 week? idk lol
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: January 10, 2014, 07:37:39 am »

Meh, concertony is right. Eimonn really wouldn't care either way.
Posted by: Concertony
« on: January 10, 2014, 07:02:42 am »

I say drop it in my opinion...but I don't own this site.
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: January 09, 2014, 07:20:03 am »

Here is the little tiny catch here. We have no real, substantial proof that Eimonn has done this.
Posted by: Peacekeeper
« on: January 04, 2014, 07:11:17 pm »

He said to me that he's joking, but i'm not sure (i'm not voting).
Posted by: Concertony
« on: January 02, 2014, 06:50:46 pm »

Quote from: Cian009 on January 02, 2014, 02:35:42 am
This image doesn't really make a difference,
Eim said he hacked, but now hes saying he didn't,
so comments saying he didn't don't really make a difference
because if you were banned you would most likely try to get unbanned.
So unless it's proof of him saying he did hack, that's the only comments that's will change this.
Ok, thought seen as I had it, may as well post it ;)
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: January 02, 2014, 12:29:20 pm »

Doesn't have the rank? You don't need ranks, all you need is a really good keylogger and bingo. Hacked.
Posted by: Cian009
« on: January 02, 2014, 02:35:42 am »

Quote from: Concertony on December 29, 2013, 08:31:57 pm
As far as I see, no one's accounts were damaged, if this is true, and a first offence, then a smaller punishment should undoubtedly be the option?
EDIT:
In addition:


This image doesn't really make a difference,
Eim said he hacked, but now hes saying he didn't,
so comments saying he didn't don't really make a difference
because if you were banned you would most likely try to get unbanned.
So unless it's proof of him saying he did hack, that's the only comments that's will change this.
Posted by: Sandwich
« on: January 01, 2014, 09:24:03 am »

Back when the Moderator position was still up, I could see I activity coming from Eimonn's account that included editing. Not any major stuff, but just some minimal changes that were unnoticeable. I'm not saying he did it, but he had access to it.

Let's not forget buddycocoloco or possibly TuckingFypo here. Buddy is a dangerous person, and TuckingFypo might be a dark horse here.
Posted by: Becky
« on: December 31, 2013, 03:41:40 pm »

Lol, by the way I didn't ban him. But the thing is, someone without the rank is hacking. But I will remove the ban if the hacking continues. But it is a major offence to claim owner of the hacking. And also have a previous offence.

But to be honest there is no evidence against Eimonn.
Posted by: Concertony
« on: December 29, 2013, 08:31:57 pm »

As far as I see, no one's accounts were damaged, if this is true, and a first offence, then a smaller punishment should undoubtedly be the option?
EDIT:
In addition:

Posted by: Becky
« on: December 28, 2013, 04:23:46 pm »

Due to a user claiming to be the party involved in the hacking action will be taken to prove either their guilt or innocence. It cannot be proven immediately so I will suspend Eimonn for the moment - until he is proven guilty or innocent. If he is innocent he will be a PoW for 2 weeks for raising a false alarm. But if he is guilty he will either be banned (forever or time limited) or PoWed for an extended period of time. You guys will choose the guilty punishment in the poll above.

Right now I'm seriously busy so I'm sorry if I take a long time to reply etc. I am on holiday as you guys are fully aware of and I just got back from the beach. (I had to take a shower and everything as well). I will be going out for dinner in about 1 hour and 30 minutes so I'm on a tight schedule. Cian will be in charge if I am not here. Staff will have to help too :D

This is the kind of time when you guys prove your loyalty and maturity to me :P

Thank you,
Becky